In an article posted yesterday at the Huffington Post, Arianna Huffington blasted John McCain, and made a surprising revelation about the Republican nominee and his wife:
At a dinner party in Los Angeles not long after the 2000 election, I was talking to a man and his wife, both prominent Republicans. The conversation soon turned to the new president. "I didn't vote for George Bush," the man confessed. "I didn't either," his wife added. Their names: John and Cindy McCain (Cindy told me she had cast a write-in vote for her husband).
The fact that this man was so angry at what George Bush had done to him, and at what Bush represented for their party, that he did not even vote for him in 2000 shows just how far he has fallen since then in his hunger for the presidency. By abandoning his core principles and embracing Bush -- both literally and metaphorically -- he has morphed into an older and crankier version of the man he couldn't stomach voting for in 2000.
Not surprisingly, Grandpa John's campaign issued a flat denial:
Tucker Bounds, a spokesman for McCain, said "It's not true, and I ask you to please consider the source."
Asked why Huffington would make up her story about McCain not voting for Bush, longtime McCain aide Mark Salter -- who has previously tangled with the Huffington Post -- ripped into her. "Why would she make something up? Because she's a flake, and a poser, and an attention seeking diva. And that's on the record."
But despite McCain's denials, Arianna is sticking to her guns, pointing out that the Straight Talk Express has ended up in the ditch more than a few times recently:
[...] John McCain has a long history of issuing heartfelt denials of things that were actually true.
He denied ever talking with John Kerry about his leaving the GOP to be Kerry's '04 running mate -- then later admitted he had, insisting: "Everybody knows that I had a conversation."
He denied admitting that he didn't know much about economics, even though he'd said exactly that to the Wall Street Journal. And the Boston Globe. And the Baltimore Sun.
He denied ever having asked for a budget earmark for Arizona, even though he had. On the record.
He denied that he'd ever had a meeting with comely lobbyist Vicki Iseman and her client Lowell Paxon, even though he had. And had admitted it in a legal deposition.
And those are just the outright denials. He's also repeatedly tried to spin away statements he regretted making (see: 100-year war, Iraq was a war for oil, etc.).
So, yes, by all means, "consider the source."
What doesn't make sense to me about this whole kerfuffle is that, now that McCain has locked up the Republican nomination, if anything, the revelation that he may have voted against Bush in 2000 probably doesn't hurt him much with the base, and might help him with independents and even some Dems. He doesn't even have to confirm it, he can just let it float around as a rumor, reinforcing his undeserved image as a maverick.
Recent Comments